The Integration of European Classics into Primary Turkish Education: Reader-Response Theory and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

Authors

  • Mahmut Bezeci Adıyaman University image/svg+xml Author
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17690959

Keywords:

European classics, Turkish primary education, Reader-Response Theory, Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

Abstract

This systematic review addresses the pedagogical challenges of integrating European classics into Turkish primary education, specifically within the context of the Ministry of National Education’s "100 Fundamental Works" list. Despite policy mandates, a significant gap exists between the "universal" philosophical intent of these texts and the practical reality of student alienation due to linguistic barriers and cultural disconnects. Utilizing the DISCAR model for qualitative document analysis, this study examines the issue through the lenses of Rosenblatt’s Reader-Response Theory and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Findings indicate that the prevailing instrumental approach prioritizes "efferent" reading, which hinders engagement. The study argues that shifting to an "aesthetic" stance—facilitated by strategies such as reading aloud and establishing intertextual connections—can transform European classics from sources of cultural alienation into instruments for critical intercultural dialogue. A "Culturally Responsive Reader-Response Model" is proposed to reconcile classical literary education with contemporary pedagogical needs.

Author Biography

  • Mahmut Bezeci, Adıyaman University

    Mahmut Bezeci, after completing his undergraduate program in Primary Teaching at Anadolu University, has been working as a primary teacher in Adıyaman. He is currently pursuing a master's degree in Primary Teaching at Adıyaman University. He lives in Adıyaman, Turkey.

References

Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley.

Karolides, N. J. (Ed.). (1992). Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature. Longman.

Martin, F. (2023). Systematic reviews in educational research. SAGE Publications.

McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43(9), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.43.9.626

Nayir, F. (2020). Çokkültürlü eğitim, kültürlerarası eğitim ve kültürel değerlere duyarlı eğitime ilişkin kavramsal bir inceleme. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(70), 769-779. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2020.4134

Oku Okut Derneği. (2025). MEB 100 Temel Eser Listesi. https://www.okuokut.org/meb-100-temel-eser/

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1983). Literature as exploration (4. bs.). Modern Language Association.

Sak, R., Şahin Sak, İ. T., Şendil, Ç. Ö., & Nas, E. (2021). Bir araştırma yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.843306

Tompkins, P. J. (1994). Reader-response criticism. John Hopkins University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

23.11.2025

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

Bezeci, M. (2025). The Integration of European Classics into Primary Turkish Education: Reader-Response Theory and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. The Primary Education Journal, 2025, 60-70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17690959