From Prompts to Pedagogy: A Pedagogical Prompting Framework for Generative AI Integration in Primary Education

Authors

  • Kawiwat Wichitchokthananon Sisaket Rajchabhat University Author https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0979-8990
    • Conceptualization
    • Methodology
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    • Visualization

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20466350

Keywords:

Pedagogical prompting, Generative AI, Primary education, Integrative learning, Teacher education, AI literacy, Teacher judgment

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly used by teachers to produce lesson plans, learning materials, questions, images, rubrics, and feedback. However, current discussions of prompt engineering in education often remain technically oriented, focusing on how teachers can obtain better AI outputs rather than how prompting can become a pedagogical practice that supports meaningful learning. This conceptual article proposes the Prompt-to-Pedagogy Framework, a pedagogically grounded model for transforming AI prompting from a technical input skill into an instructional design practice for integrative learning in primary education. Drawing on sociocultural theory, scaffolding, integrative learning, AI literacy, and teacher professional judgment, the article introduces pedagogical prompting as the intentional use of generative AI prompts to scaffold learners’ thinking, bridge knowledge across disciplines, facilitate co-creative classroom dialogue, and support teacher-led formative feedback. The framework consists of three phases: pre-class co-design, in-class collaborative prompting, and post-class feedback and reflection. Across these phases, AI is positioned as a limited support system rather than an autonomous teacher, evaluator, or curriculum authority. The article contributes to research on digital technology and education by shifting the focus from AI productivity and automation toward pedagogy, learner agency, ethical safeguards, and teacher professional judgment. Implications are discussed for teacher education, including AI-Pedagogy Labs, prompt portfolios, ethical micro-teaching, and reflective design practices for pre-service primary teachers.

Author Biography

  • Kawiwat Wichitchokthananon, Sisaket Rajchabhat University

    Kawiwat Wichitchokthananon is a tenured lecturer in the Department of Elementary Education at Sisaket Rajabhat University, Thailand. His research expertise lies at the intersection of educational technology and modern instructional design, with a particular focus on integrating artificial intelligence into project-based learning (PBL) environments. Additionally, he explores the use of visual storytelling to enhance student engagement and educational outcomes. Dedicated to advancing the academic landscape, he aims to bridge the gap between digital tools and innovative teaching methodologies to foster highly effective and immersive learning experiences.

References

Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Chen, E., Wang, D., Xu, L., Cao, C., Fang, X., & Lin, J. (2024). A systematic review on prompt engineering in large language models for K-12 STEM education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.11123

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Gu, X., & Ericson, B. J. (2025). AI literacy in K-12 and higher education in the wake of generative AI: An integrative review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.00079

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

OECD. (2026). OECD digital education outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en

Park, J., & Choo, S. (2025). Generative AI prompt engineering for educators: Practical strategies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(3), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241298954

Qian, Y. (2025). Prompt engineering in education: A systematic review of approaches and educational applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(7–8), 1782–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251365189

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

30.05.2026

Data Availability Statement

This article is a conceptual manuscript and does not report empirical data. No datasets were generated, collected, or analyzed during the preparation of this work. Data availability is therefore not applicable.

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

Wichitchokthananon, K. (2026). From Prompts to Pedagogy: A Pedagogical Prompting Framework for Generative AI Integration in Primary Education. The Primary Education Journal, 2026, 28-47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20466350